The history of abortion in America

To save the lives of more unborn Americans we should see how our pro-life predecessors succeeded in the past—and by the past I don't mean only the past three decades but the past two centuries. It's conventional to think of the abortion horror as a product of the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, but research I've done at the Library of Congress shows that abortion on the eve of the Civil War was more frequent, in proportion to the U.S. population, than it is now.

You have not just read a misprint. Roughly 160,000 abortions occurred in 1860 in a population of 30 million. Probably about 1.2 million abortions (13 percent of them through RU-486) occurred last year in a population estimated at around 307 million. The horrific current number is obviously no cause for self-congratulation, but reputable forecasters at the time of Roe v. Wade were predicting a butcher's bill of more than 4 million abortions annually by now.

With everything we're doing wrong, are we doing something right to fall far short of that 4 million prediction, and to have witnessed a decline during the past decade from 1.6 million to 1.2 million? I believe we are, and not for the first time in American history: The number of abortions in America, in proportion to the population, declined by at least 50 percent during the 50 years from 1860 to 1910. How did that happen? And is the current decline likely to continue?

Excerpted from: World Magazine

Mike Wittmer summarizes the article up fairly well, arguing that "The number one cause for the decrease in abortions was churches and Christian organizations who educated and cared for pregnant women and their babies" and that "while laws against abortion were not the main focus of the 19th century prolife movement, yet they did assist in the effort."

Comments

This shows an important way that abortion must be dealt with (through care of those facing unplanned or unexpected pregnancies), rather than through legislation. Pro-life groups seem obsessively focused on legislation, often seeming to overlook the critical question of what would happen to the 1.2 million un-aborted children and who would care for them?