Andy Crouch on "Why Christians make lame movies"

Andy Crouch being interviewed here is former executive editor at Christianity Today:

Random links

Facebook rolling out new ‘Snooze’ feature to temporarily block annoying friends & pages
Might be worthwhile. I suspect that people might want to mute me too from time to time.
The Mesh of Civilizations in the Global Network of Digital Communication
" In The Clash of Civilizations, Huntington ... famously concluded that the axes of international geo-political conflicts had reverted to the ancient cultural divisions that had characterized most of human history. ... Contrary to the supposedly borderless world of cyberspace, a bottom-up analysis confirms the persistence of the eight culturally differentiated civilizations posited by Huntington, with the divisions corresponding to differences in language, religion, economic development, and spatial distance."
Health Services as Credence Goods: A Field Experiment
"A test patient who does not need treatment is sent to 180 dentists to receive treatment recommendations. ... We find that the patient receives an overtreatment recommendation in more than every fourth visit. A low short-term demand, indicating excess capacities, leads to significantly more overtreatment recommendations. ... we observe significantly less overtreatment recommendations for the patient with higher SES compared to lower SES under standard information."

I sometimes wonder if people think through all the implications ...

What people often seem to notice when it comes it sex/gender in society as, I think, real issues where situations may not work well for those who don't quite fit existing norms. At the same point in time it seems to me that proposed responses to this often come close to the-worst-possible-thing-you-could-do-in-the-situation. I'm not quite sure that the situation I discuss below is quite the-worst-possible-thing yet it seems to me that it's a situation in which people have failed to think through the full implications of their actions:

What I'd assert above is that actions like those pursued like McKinnon create an incentive for men to be more assertive. Specifically in this case, unless you behave in a comparatively aggressive manner as a man you may be significantly more likely to be overlooked than if you were a woman - whereas if as a woman you were only willing to speak in a tiny niche of expertise journalists appear willing to dig (much) deeper to try to find you.

Men here seem to be left facing a lose-lose scenario. Unless they aggressively self-promote and claim competence they may be less likely to gain media attention from journalists than a female counterpart of equal competence behaving identically. Specifically the worst journalists in this regard would seem to be those claiming to be advocates for "gender equality". At the same time were men to conform then the result would seem to be feminist shaming for that conformity - with the gendered nature of shaming seemingly an underrecognized way in which women are able to assert power and influence.

In short I wonder if feminist myopia when it comes to assessing the full effects of interventions may backfire due to uncounted for incentives which may result in both increased male obnoxiousness and misogyny. That said, to draw from perhaps my all-time-favourite short paper How Complex Systems Fail, "all ... actions are actually gambles".

Random links

Independence error! - Only 27% of Jamaicans think the country would be in a worse position if it had remained a British colony
"A recently conducted Gleaner-commissioned Bill Johnson poll found that 49 per cent of Jamaicans believe the country would be better off today if it had remained a colony of Great Britain, with only 27 per cent of respondents disagreeing."
The Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue: Proclaiming the Deeper Truth About Political Illigitimacy
"when a political system is suffering from a “crisis of legitimacy” (Lipset 1959) with respect to at least one political constituency, members of that constituency will be motivated to see a flagrant violator of established norms as an authentic champion of its interests."
Women are less likely to study STEM subjects. But disadvantaged women are even less so
"whilst young men were drawn towards STEM subjects regardless of their parents’ social position, young women from less advantaged social backgrounds were particularly less likely to study STEM subjects. For the most advantaged third of students, there was no gender gap. This suggests that whatever is holding young women back from studying STEM is only acting as a barrier to relatively disadvantaged young women."

Pages

Subscribe to Rotundus.com RSS